SAMSUNG BRAND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
Varadarajan, DeFanti & Busch (2006) state that among that matters,
brand portfolio management is a way to determine whether to add, delete or keep
a brand. With the success of its electronic business, Samsung has been globally
recognized as an industry leader in technology. Samsung offers a wide
variety of products such as smartphones, tablets, home appliances, and watches.
In 2007 after the smartphone revolution, Samsung became the biggest competitor
of Apple and that made the smartphone category to be the master brand in the
brand portfolio. Samsung’s tagline ‘the next big thing’ is what drives the
company to use cutting-edge technology to keep up with the new technologies. As
much as the master brand is the smartphone category in the portfolio, synergy
is displayed in all Samsung products when it comes to cutting-edge technology.
Samsung brand reputation
Soumi (2015) states that brand
reputation is a holistic judgment of a brand by stakeholders. Since 2017, Samsung’s
brand reputation has been under a lot of scrutinies after it had to recall its
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 which was going up in smoke and resulted in the brand
recalling the phones back. This resulted in the company’s reputation declining
and the brand had to act to redeem itself. Samsung became proactive and asked
customers to bring back the phones to exchange with another model while
investigating the problem. To redeem its reputation back the company had to
acknowledge the problem, communicate effectively, investigate the problem and
bring new quality measures. With the new quality measures, Samsung was able to
introduce a newly improved Galaxy Note 8.
Consumers’ perspective on transparency
According to Storozhuk (2022)
brand transparency is a process of being honest and upfront with consumers about
what a brand does and why it does it. This assists the brand to gain consumer
trust and build a brand reputation. Thus,
Naidoo (2017) states that consumers believe that Samsung is positively aligned
in terms of communicating brand differentiation and responsibility and believe
that the brand needs to do more in terms of reputational elements of
credibility. Consumers feel that the brand does not truly encourage two-way
communication, and focuses rather on product communication. Consumers feel like
the brand is not transparent enough to them about what it does and why it does
it, it focuses on selling and that creates a gap between the brand and them.
Consumers’ perspective on ethical practices
Samsung has been found guilty of
numerous unethical practices. In 2013 a scandal resurfaced that the brand paid
students in Taiwan to write bad reviews about its competitors and later claimed
that this was one of its strategies. According to the research conducted by the
Ethical Consumer, their research identified a number of ethical issues with
Samsung. One of the issues includes deliberately causing phones to slow down so
that customers can buy new ones. Singh (2022) also mentions that the brand
continues to exploit and conduct unethical practices by exploiting its workers
by making them work irregular hours. Consumers also feel like the explosion of
the Galaxy Note 7 was an unethical act that put the lives of consumers at risk.
Consumer perspective on sustainability
Samsung emphasises its sustainability in the manufacturing phase. The company uses renewable energy sources such as solar in its establishments and incorporates the use of recycled water and waste. The brand has also made advances in sustainability by sourcing 100% renewable electricity for all its establishments in the United States, Europe, and China. The company now uses more renewable energy and capitalises a lot on research so that it can build energy-efficient products and develop carbon capture technology.
Recommendations on Samsung's reputation
- Samsung should be more transparent with its customers, to allow interaction so that customers can be able to resonate with the brand and improve the brand image.
- Samsung should develop a smartphone that will be a flanker brand. This smartphone must not have a deteriorating performance just like others, this would probably be targeted at students who do not have enough money to change mobile phones every other year.
- Samsung should also think about more active brand-building management with its appliances in order to create a strong relevance in its market categories, for example, its television has potential if more focus could be put on them.
References
Naidoo, S. (2017). “Understanding the role that brand
communication plays in influencing brand reputation from a consumer perspective
against the Urde and Greyser Corporate Brand Identity and Reputation Matrix:
Samsung South Africa. Vega School.
Rashmigosai.
(2018, November 21). The Brand Explorer. Retrieved from
https://thebrandexplorer.wordpress.com/2018/11/21/the-brand-portfolio-management-brand-reputation-of-the-next-big-thing/
Singh, S. (2022,
October 17). Soapboxie. Retrieved from
https://soapboxie.com/social-issues/Is-Samsung-An-Ethical-Company
Storozhuk, A. (2022, October 17). PR News.
Retrieved from
https://prnews.io/blog/48-why-do-brands-need-transparency-studies-and-recommendations.html
Suomi, K.
(2015) Managing brand identity and reputation ‒ A case study from Finnish
higher education. Doctoral thesis.
Publications of Turku School of Economics, Series A., Turku, Finland.
Varadajan,R., DeFanti, M.P. and Busch, P.S., 2006. Brand portfolio, corporate image, and reputation: Managing brand deletions. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 34(2), pp.195-205.



Comments
Post a Comment